a magazine of understanding

Dear Brethren and Co-Workers!

In Flurry's Follies, He Was Wrong!, The Memory Hole on November 29, 2011 at 7:12 am

One might be well within the bounds of reason to surmise that being disfellowshipped and Marked means our access to inside information for the PCG is severely limited, if not downright cut off completely. However, you would also be mistaken! You see, while the prospect of being cut off from friends and family does keep many in the “pews” (chairs), it is not a policy that engenders loyalty. So, in truth, PCG is merely keeping spies in their midst that would happily fade away given the chance.

More’s the pity.

However, one man’s loss is another man’s gain, and that is where we come in. AD has a network of insiders passing us vital documents, like the most recent Co-Worker letter!

It would seem the Building Fund is still $7Million in the red. So, Mr. Flurry loads up a co-worker letter and begins “firing off cliches with startling precision, like a sniper using bollocks for ammunition.”

Page 1

First comes the scare tactics: Iran and Germany, blah, blah, blah. Also, our economy is failing and soon money will be useless, so give it all to us before it does so we can do God’s Work™.

Here is something Mr. Armstrong wrote in a March 26, 1968, co-worker letter that I want you to think seriously about. “As never before, your money [sic] is in danger!” If it was in danger then, what about now? Mr. Armstrong said at that time that the dollar could be devalued overnight. Well, how about that today?

So, if Mr. Armstrong said our money was in danger of being devalued overnight forty years ago, then it must be super de-duper in danger today! Seriously? Hmmm, let’s think for a minute…he was writing in the years before everything he was preaching about 1975 in Prophecy utterly failed to happen. So, since 1975 was still a viable date for Judgment Day, he was writing in that context. Since (as previously noted) nothing at all happened, then that means He Was Wrong–not that he was right then and now he must be Ultra Right (which, coincidentally, seems to be PCG’s political/ideological leanings).

Chalk up another revelation from the Memory Hole! You see, Flurry writes about how right HWA was forty years ago and leaves the failure of the 1975 context in the nearest memory hole, to be swept to the great furnaces below. Not today, folks.

So, the work is an investment, and they’re trying to grow their web and mobile presence, but…

SOMETHING IS WRONG!

Page 2

Now comes the guilt trip that unsubtly pervades the remaining pages (only 5 pages long, so don’t run in fear).

…our building fund donations are $700,000 less than they were last year. I want you to think about that.

Before we built Armstrong Auditorium, we sent a letter to our Church members only, asking for pledges to the building fund. We used those pledges to determine how much we could invest in construction and loan repayment until all the construction costs were repaid in full. We’ve enjoyed using the auditorium for over a year now, but we still have a big balance left on the loan–over $7Million.

Have we kept our pledge to God that we would contribute toward this project until it is paid off?

Nice. Very clever. I see what you did there! Instead of asking “have you kept your pledge to god and paid the amount you pledged”, he asks if everyone has kept their pledge to keep paying until it is all paid for. Tricksy Apostleses.

I know this is a difficult time financially, and we do have unemployment problems among our members and supporters. But as Mr. Armstrong always said, God blesses us as our ways please Him. The needs of the work have never been greater. And if our ways are pleasing God, no recession or depression could make a bit of difference.

Obviously, he is aiming that statement at the terrible un-pledge-keeping lukewarm sheep, yet he is condemned out of his own mouth! He never thinks for a moment, in his unabashed hubris, that perhaps he and his church maybe aren’t pleasing god and so that’s why he isn’t blessing them. Nope. They’re wonderful! It is the stupid people who aren’t giving to the point they have nothing but pop-tarts to eat who are at fault!

However,

This is not a money issue. God could send us a trillion dollars tomorrow, or tonight, or today to pay for his house. I’m not concerned about money. I’m concerned about something far, far greater!

This is a faith issue–a character issue.

And there we go. It isn’t about money, it is simply that the lack thereof is a sign–a sign you aren’t faithful enough and don’t have enough character! Now, let me browbeat you ’til you start giving money out of a confused correlation between money and character.

I seem to remember even Old Herbert saying something about “too much Protestantism seeping into the church”. A glossed-over section of the celebrated Protestant Work Ethic is that:

money = righteousness

If you are righteous, God will bless you financially. Of course, most religions tell you that, but the Protestants worked harder at it. I know correlation doesn’t necessarily imply causation, but I think we can definitely establish a causal relationship between working hard and earning more money (more so than those who don’t work hard and just pray for the money).

It was interesting, earlier, how Flurry mentioned that he realized there were “unemployment problems”, and yet he can’t seem to imagine why that would be other than “goddunit” through the mechanism of cursing those insufficiently righteous (or as a test of faith). I’m sure he’s heard that unemployment is 9%. As of July, 2009, the US population was 307 million. 9% of that is around 27 million. That is approximately half a million per state. 500,000 unemployed per state. In short, it is an employer’s paradise. Don’t like one of your employees? Fire him–there’s 50 more in line behind him. Now, how many people are going to be fired for not working on Saturday, or for taking random other days off, or for taking two weeks off every autumn to go on holiday? That’s the world we live in, not the magical fairy world of “if you give lots of money to the Work then god will keep you in your job no matter if the unemployment rate is 19%”. Well, technically, that could be true, but as there is no clear (or even muddled) indicator of what the actual work of the actual god (whether of the christian persuasion, or some other) might be…then, yeah, statistically speaking, we don’t live in a world like that.

God loves to see us putting the needs of His Work above our own desires.

No doubt Flurry loves it, too. And no doubt the Divine Right monarchs of the Middle Ages loved to see the people do the same–they were Kings because God said so, so the heavy taxes we ask of you peasants is simply going to do the will of God, which is whatever the will of the King is because God made him King. So there! Game. Set. Match.

What?? (Flurry says) No, that’s not what I meant at all!

Did you notice that I addressed this letter to you as a co-worker with Christ? Maybe you never realized it, but that is what God has called you to be: a co-worker WITH Christ! Not just a worker for Christ, but a fellow-worker with Him!

You see? He’s not some corrupt Czar who claims “Divine Right”. No, he’s your fellow Comrade! We are all only Comrades in service to the Party (The Work), except he (Flurry) has the great responsibility (not privilege!) to be the Comrade Apostle! We must all have the attitude of Comarade (co-worker) Boxer when he says, “I will work harder”!

Page 3

The steep drop in donations received between October 2010 through today ILLUSTRATES THAT MANY OF US ARE NOT FULFILLING OUR COMMITMENT TO GOD! I am not asking you to give something you cannot give, and if your situation has changed, God is aware of that and He expects you to respond accordingly. But the building fund is down over 30% in just one year. Surely that is cause for us to examine our commitment to the pledges we made to God.

This deeply concerns me. It is a strong spiritual indicator that something is not right with too many people in this Church. Let’s be honest! Isn’t that what Laodecianism and lukewarmness is like?

Well, it looks like there was a fair-sized spike in unemployment at around Oct. 2010, so perhaps that accounts for it. So, apparently the PCG isn’t pleasing god. Flurry said a couple pages ago that “if our ways are pleasing to God, no recession or depression could make a bit of difference”. So, there you have it. Your ways are not pleasing God (or there is no god to please…) and your loyal minions are either being fired for taking two weeks off every year for some cooky religious festival, or seeing their wages cut as the lesser-of-two-evils option; and with high unemployment, there’s nothing they can do about it.

But, you know, it is still the sinful sheeple’s fault:

After all, if there’s sin in Israel, we all pay the penalty. That’s the way it was with ancient Israel when someone sinned, and that’s the way it works.

Remember back in school, where if someone talked after the teacher’s final, frustrated ultimatum, then the whole class was punished instead of just the loudmouth jerk? Remember how unfair you thought that was? And remember how now that you’re older you realize how fair, just and wise it was? Yeah, me neither. But when religion is involved, it is a far more effective tactic than when we were all teens who found sticking-it-to-the-man and the esteem that brought from our fellows to be worth the punishment we got. Now, with the whole “you’re worthless and God is everything and your sins are sinking the whole Work”, well, people who believe that sort of thing are now suffering a guilt trip that could take them to the moon and back.

He then waxes all eloquent about how he got a letter from a lady in California who thought the Auditorium was so beautiful and holy she wanted to almost take her shoes off before entering. What a godly attitude she had! Rather reminds me of the river crossing scene from Enemy at the Gates, where the boat commander is reading Patriotic letters from mothers all across Russia exhorting their sons to “not take one step back” and “fight hard for Mother Russia”, etc. Maybe this woman from Cali actually wrote this and felt this way. Maybe it was a product of the Minitrue.

Page 4

Actually, this story begins with a line or two on page 3, but the majority of it is here. Flurry starts talking about King David numbering the people of Israel–in a round about way of getting to the part where David makes some type of monetary sacrifice in order to buy some guy’s threshing floor so he could build an altar to god there. Flurry also adds a bit about “see what happens when we focus on the physical, like David did when he listened to Satan’s temptations to number the people”. Of course, that is debatable. The SAB compares I Chron. 21 with II Sam. 24, finding that in one version God was angry with Israel and “moved” David to count them so he could then curse them and kill a bunch of them. The other version says Satan tempted David. In either case, 700K Israelites die and David suffers nothing (other than the anguish of his arrogance at numbering the people–which if God moved him to do it is just some sick irony).

But besides the side point of not looking to the physical, the main point of including that story was to show that David would not accept the threshing floor as a gift from a grateful subject, but determined to sacrifice something for it–he would PAY for it. So, David, King, paid full price for the place. That likely wasn’t much of a sacrifice, what with having all the wealth of the nation’s taxes and trade to call upon. But, the Great King’s blessings of wealth are somehow glossed over in an over-zealous attempt by Flurry to make sure the lesson we carry away from this story is:

He [David] realized he had sinned, and he wanted to give an offering to God, and he wanted God to know there was some SACRIFICE in the offering he gave! It wasn’t something he could easily give. He gave something that really made him know he was giving an offering to God.

Well, unsurprisingly, there is a lot of uncertainty about what a shekel actually was, but one source I found made it that 600 shekels (the price for the threshing floor David bought) would equal approx. $298K. I doubt that hurt his coin purse all that much. But we should take away the idea that it did, and we should emulate his shining example and give ’til it hurts. And just to reinforce the message

2 Cor. 8:1-2 has a beautiful New Testament example of that same attitude. There Paul commends the Macedonians for giving liberally–but he says they gave liberally out of their deep poverty. There was some pain in their giving. That is a wonderful attitude as well.

Page 5

The rest is the closing statements, something about “God loves a cheerful giver”, we’re at a critical juncture in the work, yadda, yadda.

It was a PBS pledge drive on fundamentalist religious steroids. Guilt and scare you into giving ’til it hurts, cheerfully, and spending extra time on your knees and in the PCG’s books that explain how you should interpret the words written in your bible. So, keep your nose in our indoctrination mechanisms, stay on your knees (to remember your place, sheeple!), and use all your available money for the building fund instead of buying a car that doesn’t have to be worked on every weekend.

Do these things and the Nine will love and bless you, and you shall be prosperous, even in a bad economy, even when giving 20% + BF (building fund) and Holy Day offerings out of your net unemployment stipend and food stamps.

  1. Maybe they are low on funds because the majority of the people in Edmond are on the payroll some way shape or form. And the poor saps attending the college doing their ‘work study.’

    I don’t know if this is actually true or not but I had heard that employees of the work do not have to 2nd tithe because their income has already been tithed upon. I guess they try to avoid double taxation I mean tithe-ation for grins.

    • Unless things have changed, Guest, all HQ employees do have to pay all tithes–their pay hasn’t been pre-tithed.

  2. This is your best yet! You have a way of putting words together so very well!

    Love the total undermining of Flurry, showing that the problems are all his fault!

    One little nit, though: “out of your net unemployment”? What’s with that! It’s “out of your gross undemployment stipend and food stamps”! ;)

    • Oops…you is right. I was having two different thoughts going at the same time.

      But thank you very much for the praise–I was feeling pretty good about this one! It was fun!

  3. See you really can’t trust the rumour mill can you!

  4. P.S. I liked this post very much as well. Several of your posts are so far over my head!

  5. E.
    Do you have a catalog of Co-Worker letters and/or other current pubs of the Philadelphia Cult of God?
    - Tom T.

  6. “this is not a money issue”

    No, of course not. It’s never about the money.

    “God could send us a trillion dollars tomorrow!”

    Then why does it seem like he only sends the poor and the elderly your way? People like my grandfather, you remember him right? When he cut you a check that year for $25,000 – nearly cleaning out his savings in the process – that was Yahweh too, right?

    You are bottom feeders, nothing more. Don’t ever let your snazzy suits or fancy auditorium convince you otherwise.

    • That’s bloody awful Jace :(

      So many people have given so much, and for what! Nothing.

      My great grandmother left the house and everything she owned to the SDA church on her death bed after a visit from the pastor. No inheritance for the kids.

      Damn sickening.

      • Yeah it is Kirrily.

        But $25k doesn’t even come close to the value of an entire house… that should’ve gone to her family.

        In my grandfathers case, I guess it was the obscenely high price he paid for the sense of purpose he got from the cult.

        The PCG used to have a newsstand program. I think they started it back in 99-00′. ( I suspect that they ended it) They’d have members put up magazine racks in/outside of various local businesses.

        My parents are small business owners themselves, so of course a rack went up in their store. (probably driving away business). As small biz owners, they were already overworked just trying to pay the bills. But my dad was also the local church elder (and way too zealous) so he and my mom would stay out until 10-11pm after work just driving around and filling these damned racks. They put out a TON of those thrice cursed magazines.

        But my grandpa? He put them to shame. He was semi-retired and had more free time to drive around (in his dilapidated old van), trying to find businesses who would take the damn things, and then filling them up. I try not to think about it in terms of how many hours of his life he wasted doing that. Instead, I look at the happiness he must have gotten from “serving the work” or whatever. It’s a “laugh to keep from crying” kinda thing.

        The newsstand program is but another family mistake for which I would apologize (to my community in general), except for one thing: I don’t think even one member was ever added to our local church area from that campaign. At least, not when I was still in PCG.

        I can only hope the newsstand program was a similar “success” in other parts of the country.

  7. No, Mr. Tom Bagginz (hehe), no catalog, as such…just occasional access. Of course, booklets, the Trumpet, etc, everyone has access to all the time–just download the booklets pdf. But sometimes get more of the insider info.

  8. I wonder, considering the tone of this “co-worker” letter, how many non-member “co-workers” it went to. Do they even have those anymore? Did they ever?

  9. I don’t know, but after sending out this letter, they probably lost a few more.

  10. Seriously, though, this is just a bad way to solicit money from donors. That’s what it comes down to. Basic psychology. Really, I know this because I Googled it. Here’s what this book says:

    Consider the would – be prophet who predicts Armageddon next year. Who will heed the prophet when next year has come and gone and the world is still in one piece? A fundraiser who builds the case for giving on the worst – case scenario may be building on quicksand (oh ye of little faith)…Yet I believe guilt is highly overrated as a motivator. Rarely will donors who are moved primarily by guilt prove loyal over the years, and larger gifts from them are relatively rare. As a fundraising strategy, guilt may be just as counterproductive in the long run as fear.

    And another one:

    The best advice is worth repeating: “Leaders who remember that giving is about the donor and not about their organization” will vastly increase their fundraising success in both the short and long term…It’s likely the primary motivating factor of the donor is advancing your mission, so if you’re talking to someone who is a doctor, and you’re saying, ‘This gift will help us advance this area of medicine that we know you’re really interested in,’ that’s the benefit. Don’t get into how that all fits into your strategic plan. [The emphasis] is the donor’s agenda and how you’re advancing the donor’s agenda, which is hopefully synonymous with your agenda.”

    Seems Gerald forgot what “the church” is for (hint, Gerrie: funding monumental-yet-earthly institutional projects is not the answer). But that’s not my department any more. So…it’s just fun to watch the thing crumble under its own fumbling top-heaviness. Hahahaha. Idiots.

  11. Of course, it is the members’ fault. Of course, it’s a “strong indicator” that there is something wrong in the PCG. There is NO way it could be church leadership. That’s never happened before in recent or ancient history. I wonder if we could all get a class action suit going to get back all of our tithes & offerings? Seriously, the amount of brainwashing & scare tactics they have used should be civilly & criminally punishable.

    • I don’t agree. Seems to me folks could stop being so gullible. There are ways to avoid believing stupid nonsense so you don’t get conned. The susceptibility to being duped is what fuels these schemes, you know.

  12. My mother in law belongs to this crazy bunch. Thank goodness I have been able to keep my husband away. He is now beginning to see they are a cult.

    • Good that he’s seeing that. Though, when I was in the PCG I knew it was a cult–almost everyone knew it and took pride in it. However, the leadership never wanted the Church listed as a “cult” in court, b/c in “the World” the word Cult means bad things. And well it should.

      But now, of course, I see the church as the apocryphal Cult (worldly definition) it is–and hopefully that’s the way he’s seeing it, too.

Say anything you want. We do.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 43 other followers

%d bloggers like this: